Follow us on Facebook
Breaking updates in your feed — tap to open
The Present Situation of Proprietary Ecosystems
The wearable technology industry has gotten completely out of hand over the past few years with accessories such as Fitbit, Garmin, and Apple reached classic products in the hands of millions of people. These gadgets monitor the daily number of steps, changes in the heart rate, sleep, and oxygen levels, among other details, to provide a holistic view of personal health indicators. Nonetheless, this data abundance is still mostly confined to proprietary ecosystems, which limits the potential value of such information to the individuals and the healthcare system in general. This disintegration can be viewed as an important obstacle to fulfill the full potential of wearable technology as a preventive medicine and medical research.
A majority of the leading wearable companies run closed systems in which the data gathered by their devices is not transferred to other applications and services. The health data of an Apple Watch service user usually remains in the Apple Health platform, whereas the cardiovascular-related statistics of a Garmin user device are located on the Garmin Connect platform. This are the siloed ways and consequently they bring about a number of issues to consumers who may desire to change to other devices or use more than two wearables of different brands. The interoperability issue causes significant historical data to be hard to access or lose its context when it is transferred between platforms making users practically stuck to certain brand will their health information amass.
In addition to inconvenience to consumers, proprietary data systems are a great hindrance to medical researchers and healthcare workers. A doctor who is trying to analyze the trends in the health of a patient may be asked to enter various applications to visualize information found in other devices, which may complicate the process of clinical decisions. The challenge of putting together data about a large population of incompatible systems poses an overwhelming challenge to researchers working on the population health patterns, and it may be prudent to mention that the most common method to address such an issue involves using complex workarounds, which may compromise the data quality. This division hinders medical research and does not allow the type of massive study that can result in the discovery of the chronic diseases and preventive care measures.
New Open Platforms and Standards
An emerging trend in open data standards is likely to overcome these shortcomings by developing models of wearable device and health application interoperability. Some organizations such as the Continua Health Alliance and standards such as FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) are creating protocols that would potentially allow the smooth exchange of data across systems. These open platforms would enable the free flow of wearable data among devices, applications and healthcare systems as well as privacy and security protections. The move to USB-C in most devices illustrates how standardization can be of benefit to the consumer, and the couple of notions can redefine health data portability.
It would provide consumers with an increased choice and switching of devices without losing their precious health history. One would begin with an affordable trackable device that fulfills their simple needs, like tracking calories burned or distance covered, and then progress to a flagship smartphone-connected device, which offers greater health tracking capabilities, and continue to keep a record of their health data. This portability would also make it easy to perform more advanced analysis by using third-party applications which would be able to bring together data of a variety of sources which might provide information which other individual proprietary systems are not able to provide. This is because the OLED screens and the state-of-the-art sensors that run various types of modern wearables can produce rich data, which is worthy of consideration other than only as a brand-specific application.
Healthcare and Research benefits
The advantages of the open wearables data standard are not limited to the improved convenience of individuals in their lives but have a potential to alter the manner in which healthcare is provided and the field of medical research in general. By standardizing and using portable health data, healthcare providers would have access to high-quality patient data in many different sources of wearables, through a single interface because of standardization, and make better clinical decisions and develop tailor-made treatment plans. Continuous monitoring data might be provided to the patients with chronic conditions and their care teams and therefore they can intervene earlier when the metrics are showing emerging issues. This combination may be especially useful when the conditions such as high blood pressure, diabetes, and sleep disorders are to be addressed as the constant monitoring may be essential to gain new insights.
Availability of larger and more diverse collections of data under standardized formats will be of great benefit to medical researchers. By looking at anonymized data of millions of wearables on various devices, researchers could do studies that can be considered to be conducted by any user, thus discoveries made faster on the trends of health, diseases, and their treatments. This mass study may identify correlations that would not have been identified in smaller and proprietary datasets, and may yield new advances in preventive medicine and community health approaches. Privacy and security of health data will require special attention, although with the right standards in place, the process would potentially increase the security due to the system of security measures.
Technical and Implementation: Problems
Although such a change may have obvious advantages, there are technical and practical challenges associated with implementing universal open standards of wearable health data. Various manufacturers apply in different sensors, various algorithms, and techniques of measurements which may give different results in case of monitoring of the same health metrics. Turning these measurements into a standard and keeping them consistent between equipment of various vendors is a complicated engineering issue that involves a cooperative effort between the rivals. Also, the move to open systems will come with huge development and development costs and may destabilize current business models that are based on the idea of data exclusivity.
Privacy and security could be the most essential ones regarding the establishment of open health data ecosystems. Some of the most personal data are captured by their wearable gadgets, such as their location, our activity habits, and physiological data that may be abused unless adequately secured. Any free standard should contain sturdy privacy controls, explicit user consent measures, and clarified policies of usage of the data. Its experience on smartphone security and privacy settings serves as a good learning base in being able to apply the same in wearable health data systems whereby the users will retain control of how their information is shared and utilized.
The Way Ahead of Consumers and Industry
Market pressure can bring manufacturers to increased interoperability as a result of increased consumer awareness on the issue of data portability. The people who already spend money on premium devices that have a strong battery, rapid charge, and complementary health trackers are becoming more and more determined to own their data and not to rent their data to proprietary platforms. Such consumer awareness, in addition to possible regulatory efforts in favor of data portability, will catalyze the introduction of openstandards in the wearable sector. The history of wireless charging standards demonstrates that the ability of industry cooperation may help consumers and, at the same time, introduces the possibility of product differentiation and innovation.
In the case of the wearable industry, the adoption of open standards may in fact generate business opportunities instead of merely posing a threat to the already established business models. Since hardware quality, sensor accuracy, user experience, and specialized analytics are features companies can differiate on, as opposed to data lock-in, companies that target a particular niche, such as gaming performance or mobile photography, have shown that being excellent at the hardware can make them successful even in competitive markets. Correspondingly, the wearable manufacturers may be able to engage in the competition based on display quality, durability, and additional health monitoring features with the aim of increasing the value of shared data ecosystems that will help all parties.
The shift to open wearable health data standards is a difficult yet essential shift in an industry that has already hit a therefore of inflexion. The more advanced the devices become in measuring and capturing all formats of data (heart rate variability, sleeping patterns, etc), the more valuable the data gets exponentially as it can be put in one place and analyzed and used in different situations. These technical difficulties are tremendous yet the benefits of this endeavor in personal health management, medical research, and delivery of healthcare cannot be overestimated. With the same case of the smartphone industry moving away as fragmented ecosystems to more open ones, the wearable industry will now have to focus on its weaknesses in data portability to do so in order to achieve its potentials as a revolution in health and wellness.
